PISA 2022 Results (Volume II)

Annex B1. Results for countries and economies
Table II.B1.1.1. Students' sense of belonging at school [1/6]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.1. Students' sense of belonging at school [2/6]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.1. Students' sense of belonging at school [3/6]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.1. Students' sense of belonging at school [4/6]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.1. Students' sense of belonging at school [5/6]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.1. Students' sense of belonging at school [6/6]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.5. Change between 2018 and 2022 in the index of sense of belonging [1/2]
Based on students' reports

Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.5. Change between 2018 and 2022 in the index of sense of belonging [2/2]
Based on students' reports

Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.7. Change between 2018 and 2022 in sense of belonging, by students' socio-economic status [1/2]
Based on students' reports

1. A socio-economically disadvantaged (advantaged) student is a student in the bottom (top) quarter of the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) in his or her own country/economy.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1.7. Change between 2018 and 2022 in sense of belonging, by students' socio-economic status [2/2]
Based on students' reports

1. A socio-economically disadvantaged (advantaged) student is a student in the bottom (top) quarter of the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) in his or her own country/economy.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3). Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [1/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [2/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [3/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [4/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [5/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [6/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [7/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.5. Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning [8/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [1/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [2/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [3/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [4/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [5/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [6/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [7/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [8/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [9/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.24. Experience with learning at home [10/10]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [1/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [2/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [3/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [4/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [5/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [6/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [7/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.2.30. Problems with remote learning [8/8]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.1. Teacher support in mathematics [1/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.1. Teacher support in mathematics [2/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.1. Teacher support in mathematics [3/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.1. Teacher support in mathematics [4/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [1/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [2/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [3/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [4/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [5/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [6/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [7/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.9. Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons [8/8]
Based on students' reports

1. Higher values in the index indicate a more positive disciplinary climate.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.23. School safety risks [1/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.23. School safety risks [2/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.23. School safety risks [3/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.3.23. School safety risks [4/4]
Based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.10. Grade repetition [1/2]
Based on students' reports

1. The questions on grade repetition were not administered in Japan and Norway. The share of grade repeaters has been set to zero in agreement with countries since there is a policy of automatic grade progression and more than 99.5% of students were enrolled in the same grade level.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.10. Grade repetition [2/2]
Based on students' reports

1. The questions on grade repetition were not administered in Japan and Norway. The share of grade repeaters has been set to zero in agreement with countries since there is a policy of automatic grade progression and more than 99.5% of students were enrolled in the same grade level.
Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.17. Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance [1/6]

1. The isolation index measures the extent to which certain types of students (e.g. disadvantaged students) are isolated from other all other types of students or from a specific group of students (e.g. advantaged students), based on the schools they attend. It ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to full exposure (no segregation) and 1 to full isolation/segregation.
2. Only countries and economies where at least 5% of the student population has an immigrant background are examined.
3. Low-achieving students are students who score among the bottom 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test.
4. High-achieving students are students who score among the top 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.17. Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance [2/6]

1. The isolation index measures the extent to which certain types of students (e.g. disadvantaged students) are isolated from other all other types of students or from a specific group of students (e.g. advantaged students), based on the schools they attend. It ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to full exposure (no segregation) and 1 to full isolation/segregation. 2. Only countries and economies where at least 5% of the student population has an immigrant background are examined. 3. Low-achieving students are students who score among the bottom 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test. 4. High-achieving students are students who score among the top 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test. Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error.
Table II.B1.4.17. Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance [3/6]

1. The isolation index measures the extent to which certain types of students (e.g. disadvantaged students) are isolated from other all other types of students or from a specific group of students (e.g. advantaged students), based on the schools they attend. It ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to full exposure (no segregation) and 1 to full isolation/segregation.
2. Only countries and economies where at least 5% of the student population has an immigrant background are examined.
3. Low-achieving students are students who score among the bottom 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test.
4. High-achieving students are students who score among the top 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.17. Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance [4/6]

1. The isolation index measures the extent to which certain types of students (e.g. disadvantaged students) are isolated from other all other types of students or from a specific group of students (e.g. advantaged students), based on the schools they attend. It ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to full exposure (no segregation) and 1 to full isolation/segregation. 2. Only countries and economies where at least 5% of the student population has an immigrant background are examined. 3. Low-achieving students are students who score among the bottom 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test. 4. High-achieving students are students who score among the top 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test. Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3). Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.17. Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance [5/6]

1. The isolation index measures the extent to which certain types of students (e.g. disadvantaged students) are isolated from other all other types of students or from a specific group of students (e.g. advantaged students), based on the schools they attend. It ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to full exposure (no segregation) and 1 to full isolation/segregation.
2. Only countries and economies where at least 5% of the student population has an immigrant background are examined.
3. Low-achieving students are students who score among the bottom 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test.
4. High-achieving students are students who score among the top 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test.
Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.17. Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance [6/6]

1. The isolation index measures the extent to which certain types of students (e.g. disadvantaged students) are isolated from other all other types of students or from a specific group of students (e.g. advantaged students), based on the schools they attend. It ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to full exposure (no segregation) and 1 to full isolation/segregation. 2. Only countries and economies where at least 5% of the student population has an immigrant background are examined. 3. Low-achieving students are students who score among the bottom 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test. 4. High-achieving students are students who score among the top 25% of students within their country or economy on the PISA test. Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.4.26. Ability grouping [1/2]
Results based on principals' reports

Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage
Table II.B1.4.26. Ability grouping [2/2]
Results based on principals' reports

Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but
less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage
Table II.B1.5.4. Shortage of education staff in 2015, 2018 and 2022 [1/4]

Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.4. Shortage of education staff in 2015, 2018 and 2022 [2/4]

Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.4. Shortage of education staff in 2015, 2018 and 2022 [3/4]

Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.4. Shortage of education staff in 2015, 2018 and 2022 [4/4]

Notes: Values that are statistically significant are indicated in bold (see Annex A3).
Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.46. Student behaviour when using digital devices [1/6]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.46. Student behaviour when using digital devices [2/6]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.46. Student behaviour when using digital devices [3/6]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.46. Student behaviour when using digital devices [4/6]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.46. Student behaviour when using digital devices [5/6]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.46. Student behaviour when using digital devices [6/6]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.64. Mean mathematics performance per time spent learning on digital devices at school [1/2]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.5.64. Mean mathematics performance per time spent learning on digital devices at school [2/2]
In hours; results based on students' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.31. Reasons for transferring students to another school [1/4]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.31. Reasons for transferring students to another school [2/4]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.31. Reasons for transferring students to another school [3/4]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.31. Reasons for transferring students to another school [4/4]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [1/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [2/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [3/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [4/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [5/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [6/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [7/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.38. Assessment practices at school [8/8]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.58. Quality assurance and improvement actions at school [1/6]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.58. Quality assurance and improvement actions at school [2/6]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.58. Quality assurance and improvement actions at school [3/6]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.58. Quality assurance and improvement actions at school [4/6]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.58. Quality assurance and improvement actions at school [5/6]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.6.58. Quality assurance and improvement actions at school [6/6]
Results based on principals' reports

Note: Information regarding the proportion of the sample covered is shown next to the standard error. No symbol means at least 75% of the population was covered; one dagger (†) means at least 50% but less than 75%; and one double-dagger (‡) means less than 50% was covered. For comparisons across cycles, the coverage information corresponds to the cycle with the lowest sample coverage.
Table II.B1.1. Resilient education system in PISA 2022
Table II.B1.1.1 |
Students' sense of belonging at school |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.2 |
Index of sense of belonging, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.3 |
Index of sense of belonging, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.4 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in sense of belonging |
Table II.B1.1.5 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in the index of sense of belonging |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.6 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in sense of belonging, by schools' socio-economic profile |
Table II.B1.1.7 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in sense of belonging, by students' socio-economic status |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.8 |
Sense of belonging and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.9 |
Sense of belonging and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.10 |
Students' life satisfaction |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.11 |
Students' life satisfaction across domains and overall life satisfaction |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.12 |
Life satisfaction and other indicators of students’ subjective well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.13 |
Sense of belonging, and performance and equity |
WEB |
Table II.B1.1.14 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in sense of belonging, and performance and equity |
Table II.B1.2. Learning and school closure as covered in PISA 2022
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.1 |
Duration and type of school closure |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.2 |
Student characteristics, by response status to the question on the length of school closure |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.3 |
Students' enrolment at their school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.4 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in students' career expectations |
Table II.B1.2.4 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.6 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.7 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.8 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.9 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning and science performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.10 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning and reading performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.11 |
Confidence in capacity for self-directed learning and socio-economic status |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.12 |
Students' persistence |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.13 |
Students' curiosity |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.14 |
Students' co-operation |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.15 |
Students' empathy |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.16 |
Students' assertiveness |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.17 |
Students' stress resistance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.18 |
Students' emotional control |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.19 |
Social and emotional skills, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.20 |
Persistence and learning resources during Covid-19 school closure |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.21 |
Curiosity and learning resources during Covid-19 school closure |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.22 |
Index of school preparation for remote instruction |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.23 |
Perceived preparedness for remote instruction, by actions taken |
Table II.B1.2.24 |
Experience with learning at home |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.25 |
Teacher support during school closures, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.26 |
Experience with learning at home and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.27 |
Experience with learning at home and science performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.28 |
Experience with learning at home and reading performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.29 |
School actions to maintain learning, and students' self-directed learning |
Table II.B1.2.30 |
Problems with remote learning |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.31 |
Problems with remote learning, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.32 |
Problems with remote learning and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.33 |
Problems with remote learning and science performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.34 |
Problems with remote learning and reading performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.35 |
Problems with remote learning, and students' sense of belonging |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.36 |
School actions and activities to maintain learning |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.37 |
School actions and activities to maintain learning, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.38 |
School actions and activities to maintain learning, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.39 |
School actions and activities to maintain learning, and science performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.40 |
School actions and activities to maintain learning, and reading performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.41 |
School actions to maintain learning and selected measures of student well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.42 |
School actions to maintain learning and students' self-directed learning |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.43 |
School actions to maintain learning and students' self-directed learning, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.44 |
School actions to maintain learning and mathematics anxiety, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.45 |
Learning during and from school closures, and performance, equity and life satisfaction |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.46 |
Learning during and from school closures, and change in performance, equity and life satisfaction |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.47 |
Learning during and from school closures, and confidence in capacity for self-directed learning |
WEB |
Table II.B1.2.48 |
Learning during and from school closures, and change between 2018 and 2022 in performance and sense of belonging adjusted for pre-2018 long-term trend |
Table II.B1.3. School life and support from home as covered in PISA 2022
Table II.B1.3.1 |
Teacher support in mathematics |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.2 |
Teacher support, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.3 |
Teacher support, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.4 |
Change between 2012 and 2022 in teacher support in mathematics lessons |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.5 |
Teacher support and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.6 |
Teacher support and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.7 |
Teacher support and selected measures of student well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.8 |
Teacher support and mathematics anxiety |
Table II.B1.3.9 |
Disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.10 |
Disciplinary climate, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.11 |
Disciplinary climate, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.12 |
Change between 2012 and 2022 in disciplinary climate in mathematics lessons |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.13 |
Disciplinary climate and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.14 |
Disciplinary climate and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.15 |
Disciplinary climate and selected measures of student well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.16 |
Disciplinary climate and mathematics anxiety |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.17 |
Feeling safe at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.18 |
Feeling safe at school, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.19 |
Feeling safe at school, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.20 |
Feeling safe at school and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.21 |
Feeling safe at school and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.22 |
Feeling safe at school and selected measures of student well-being |
Table II.B1.3.23 |
School safety risks |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.24 |
School safety risks, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.25 |
School safety risks, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.26 |
School safety risks and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.27 |
School safety risks and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.28 |
School safety risks and selected measures of student well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.29 |
Relationship between school safety risks and sense of belonging at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.30 |
Students' exposure to bullying |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.31 |
Students' exposure to bullying, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.32 |
Students' exposure to bullying, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.33 |
Change between 2015 and 2022 in students' exposure to bullying |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.34 |
Students' exposure to bullying and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.35 |
Students' exposure to bullying and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.36 |
Exposure to bullying and selected measures of student well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.37 |
Student truancy |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.38 |
Student truancy, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.39 |
Student truancy, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.40 |
Student lateness |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.41 |
Student lateness, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.42 |
Student lateness, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.43 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in student truancy and lateness |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.44 |
Student truancy and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.45 |
Student truancy and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.46 |
Student lateness and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.47 |
Extent of student truancy and lateness, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.48 |
Student lateness and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.49 |
Long-term student absence from primary to upper secondary |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.50 |
Long-term student absence at any education level, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.51 |
Long-term student absence, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.52 |
Student long-term absence, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.53 |
School-level long-term absence and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.54 |
Extent of student long-term absence, by education level, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.55 |
Reasons for long-term absence |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.56 |
Long-term absence out of boredom, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.57 |
Long-term absence out of boredom, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.58 |
Parental involvement |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.59 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's behaviour on parent's initiative, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.60 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's behaviour on teacher's initiative, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.61 |
Parent-teacher discussion on child's progress on parent's initiative, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.62 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's progress on teacher's initiative, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.63 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's behaviour on parent's initiative, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.64 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's behaviour on teacher's initiative, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.65 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's progress on parent's initiative, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.66 |
Parent-teacher discussion of child's progress on the teacher's initiative, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.67 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in parental involvement |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.68 |
Parental involvement in school-related activities and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.69 |
Family support |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.70 |
Family support, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.71 |
Family support, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.72 |
Family support and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.73 |
Degree of family support and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.74 |
Family support and mathematics performance (school level) |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.75 |
Family support and selected measures of student well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.76 |
School life, performance and equity in mathematics, and sense of belonging |
WEB |
Table II.B1.3.77 |
Change between 2012/2018 and 2022 in school life, performance and equity in mathematics, and sense of belonging |
Table II.B1.4. School system stratification as covered in PISA 2022
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.1 |
Attendance at pre-primary school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.2 |
Attendance at pre-primary school, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.3 |
Attendance at pre-primary school, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.4 |
Trends in attendance at pre-primary school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.5 |
Attendance at pre-primary school and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.6 |
Attendance at pre-primary school and grade repetition |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.7 |
Student grade level |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.8 |
Students enrolled in grades below modal grade, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.9 |
Students enrolled in grades above modal grade, by student characteristics |
Table II.B1.4.10 |
Grade repetition |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.11 |
Grade repetition, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.12 |
Grade repetition, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.13 |
Trends in grade repetition |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.14 |
Grade repetition and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.15 |
School-level grade repetition and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.16 |
Student characteristics, by the number of times they had repeated a grade |
Table II.B1.4.17 |
Isolation index, by socio-economic status, immigrant background, gender and mathematics performance |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.18 |
School composition |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.19 |
Programme orientation, by education level |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.20 |
Students enrolled in general programmes, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.21 |
Students enrolled in pre-vocational or vocational programmes, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.22 |
Students enrolled in general programmes, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.23 |
Students enrolled in pre-vocational or vocational programmes, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.24 |
Trends in programme orientation |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.25 |
Programme orientation and mathematics performance |
Table II.B1.4.26 |
Ability grouping |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.27 |
Ability grouping between classes, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.28 |
Ability grouping within classes, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.29 |
Trends in ability grouping |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.30 |
Ability grouping and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.31 |
Selecting and grouping students, performance and equity in mathematics, and sense of belonging |
WEB |
Table II.B1.4.32 |
Trends in selecting and grouping students, performance and equity in mathematics, and sense of belonging |
Table II.B1.5. Investments for learning and well-being as covered in PISA 2022
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.1 |
Shortage of education staff |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.2 |
Shortage of education staff, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.3 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in the shortage of education staff |
Table II.B1.5.4 |
Shortage of education staff in 2015, 2018 and 2022 |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.5 |
Shortage of education staff and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.6 |
Relationship between mathematics performance and shortage of education staff |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.7 |
Certified teachers |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.8 |
Certified teachers |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.9 |
Results based on principals' reports |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.10 |
Fully certified teachers and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.11 |
Student-teacher ratio |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.12 |
Student-teacher ratio |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.13 |
Student-teacher ratio, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.14 |
Variation in mathematics class size, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.15 |
Variation in language-of-instruction class size, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.16 |
Test language class size, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.17 |
Shortage of educational material |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.18 |
Shortage of educational material, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.19 |
Lack of digital resources in schools, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.20 |
Inadequate or poor quality digital resources in schools, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.21 |
Shortage of educational material, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.22 |
Shortage of material resources by item, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.23 |
Shortage of material resources and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.24 |
Availability of computers, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.25 |
Availability of computers, 2012-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.26 |
Availability of computers and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.27 |
Availability of tablet devices, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.28 |
Availability of tablet devices and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.29 |
Preparedness for digital learning |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.30 |
Preparedness for digital learning, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.31 |
Qualified technical assistant staff , by students and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.32 |
Preparedness for digital learning, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.33 |
Preparedness for digital learning and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.34 |
Relationship between preparedness for digital learning, availability of computers and the school has formal guidelines for the use of digital devices for teaching and learning in specific subjects. |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.35 |
School policies on the use of digital devices |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.36 |
School policies on the use of digital devices, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.37 |
Cell phone use at school, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.38 |
School policies on the use of digital devices and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.39 |
Students' use of smartphone at school when smartphones are not allowed |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.40 |
Distraction using digital devices in mathematics lessons |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.41 |
Distraction using digital devices in mathematics lessons and frequency of use |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.42 |
Distraction using digital devices in mathematics lessons, educational software and school guidelines |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.43 |
Distraction using digital devices in mathematics lessons, and school guidelines and policies |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.44 |
Distraction using digital devices in mathematics lessons and student behaviour |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.45 |
Turning off notifications before going to sleep and smartphones not allowed at school |
Table II.B1.5.46 |
Student behaviour when using digital devices |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.47 |
Feeling pressured to be on line and answer messages when in class, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.48 |
Feeling nervous/anxious when digital devices are not nearby, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.49 |
Feeling pressured to be on line and answer messages when in class, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.50 |
Feeling nervous/anxious when digital devices are not nearby, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.51 |
Student behaviour when using digital devices, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.52 |
Learning time per week in regular school lessons |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.53 |
Total learning time per week in regular lessons, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.54 |
Total learning time per week in regular lessons, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.55 |
Total learning time per week in regular lessons and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.56 |
Time spent on homework per day, by subject |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.57 |
Spending less time per day doing homework, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.58 |
Spending more time per day doing homework, by students characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.59 |
Spending less time per day doing homework, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.60 |
Spending more time doing homework, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.61 |
Time spent doing homework in mathematics or in all subjects, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.62 |
Time spent per day on digital resources, by purpose |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.63 |
Time spent per day on digital devices, by purpose |
Table II.B1.5.64 |
Mean mathematics performance per time spent learning on digital devices at school |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.65 |
Mean mathematics performance per time spent for leisure on digital devices at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.66 |
Time spent on digital devices for learning at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.67 |
Time spent on digital devices for leisure at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.68 |
Time spent per day on digital resources for learning at school, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.69 |
Time spent per day on digital resources for learning before and after school, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.70 |
Time spent per day on digital resources for learning on weekends, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.71 |
Time spent per day on digital resources for leisure at school, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.72 |
Time spent per day on digital resources for leisure before and after school, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.73 |
Time spent per day on digital resources for leisure on weekends, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.74 |
Time spent per week on digital devices, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.75 |
Time spent per week on digital devices for learning activities, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.76 |
Time spent per week on digital devices for leisure, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.77 |
Time spent per day on digital resources and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.78 |
Time spent per week on digital devices for learning and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.79 |
Time spent per week on digital devices for leisure and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.80 |
Time spent per week on digital devices and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.81 |
Feeling nervous/anxious without digital devices nearby and selected student outcomes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.82 |
Schools providing study help |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.83 |
Schools providing room(s) for homework and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.84 |
Schools where staff provides help with homework and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.85 |
Schools providing peer-to-peer tutoring and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.86 |
Schools providing study help, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.87 |
Schools providing study help and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.88 |
Schools providing study help and students' well-being |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.89 |
Students' views on using digital devices in class |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.90 |
Students' views on using digital devices in class, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.91 |
Students' views on using digital devices in class, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.92 |
Students' views on using digital devices in class and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.93 |
Part-time and full time teachers |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.94 |
Full-time teachers |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.95 |
Part-time teachers |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.96 |
Students' exposure to full-time teachers, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.97 |
Students' exposure to part-time teachers, by students and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.98 |
Teacher contracts, 2018-2022 |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.99 |
Full-time and part-time teachers, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.100 |
Material resources and relationship with student outcomes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.101 |
Human resources and relationship with student outcomes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.102 |
Time resources and relationship with student outcomes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.103 |
Change in material resources and relationship with student outcomes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.104 |
Change between 2018 and 2022 in human resources and relationship with student outcomes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.5.105 |
Study help, extracurricular activities and relationship with student outcomes |
Table II.B1.6. Governance of education systems as covered in PISA 2022
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.1 |
Responsibilities for school governance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.2 |
School responsibility for curriculum, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.3 |
School responsibility for resources, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.4 |
Responsibilities for school governance and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.5 |
Educational and instructional leadership |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.6 |
Educational leadership, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.7 |
Instructional leadership, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.8 |
Educational and instructional leadership, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.9 |
School competition for students |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.10 |
School competition for students, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.11 |
Trends in school competition for students |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.12 |
School competition and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.13 |
School type |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.14 |
Attendance at public schools, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.15 |
Attendance at government-dependent private schools, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.16 |
Attendance at private independent schools, by student characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.17 |
Attendance at public schools, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.18 |
Attendance at government-dependent private schools, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.19 |
Attendance at private independent schools, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.20 |
Trends in enrolment in public and private schools |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.21 |
School type and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.22 |
School funding and composition |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.23 |
Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, by school type |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.24 |
Criteria for choosing a school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.25 |
Socio-economic differences in parents' criteria when choosing a school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.26 |
Criteria for choosing a school and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.27 |
School admissions policies |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.28 |
School selectivity, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.29 |
Trends in school admissions policies |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.30 |
School admissions policies and mathematics performance |
Table II.B1.6.31 |
Reasons for transferring students to another school |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.32 |
Transferring students because of low academic achievement, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.33 |
Transferring students for high academic achievement, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.34 |
Transferring students for behavioural problems, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.35 |
Transferring students for special learning needs, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.36 |
Transferring students at parents’ or guardians’ request, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.37 |
Reasons for transferring students, and mathematics performance |
Table II.B1.6.38 |
Assessment practices at school |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.39 |
Mandatory standardised tests, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.40 |
Non-mandatory standardised tests, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.41 |
Teacher-developed tests, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.42 |
Teachers' judgemental ratings, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.43 |
Trends in assessment practices at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.44 |
Assessment practices at school and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.45 |
Using achievement data for accountability purposes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.46 |
Posting mathematics achievement data publicly, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.47 |
Tracking mathematics achievement data over time, by school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.48 |
Providing mathematics achievement data to parents, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.49 |
Trends in the use of achievement data for accountability purposes |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.50 |
Using achievement data for accountability purposes and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.51 |
Monitoring teacher practice |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.52 |
Monitoring teacher practice through assessments of student achievement, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.53 |
Monitoring teacher practice through peer review, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.54 |
Monitoring teacher practice through internal observations of lessons, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.55 |
Monitoring teacher practice through external observation of classes, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.56 |
Trends in monitoring teacher practice |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.57 |
Monitoring teacher practice and mathematics performance |
Table II.B1.6.58 |
Quality assurance and improvement actions at school |
|
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.59 |
Internal evaluations or self-evaluations in school, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.60 |
External evaluations in school, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.61 |
Written specifications of school’s curricular profile and educational goals, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.62 |
Written specifications of student performance standards, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.63 |
Systematic recording of data in the school, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.64 |
Systematic recording of student test results and graduation rates, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.65 |
Seeking written feedback from students, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.66 |
Teacher mentoring in the school, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.67 |
Regular consultation aimed at school improvement, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.68 |
Standardised policy for mathematics subjects, by student and school characteristics |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.69 |
Trends in quality assurance and improvement actions at school |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.70 |
Quality assurance and improvement actions at school, and mathematics performance |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.71 |
Governance and quality assurance, performance and equity in mathematics, and sense of belonging |
WEB |
Table II.B1.6.72 |
Trends in governance and quality assurance, performance and equity in mathematics, and sense of belonging |