The OECD Investment Policy Framework for Digital Transformation aims to help governments promote private investment that supports digital transformation. Building upon existing OECD investment standards, it identifies key policies that are relevant for enabling investment in support of digital transformation and harnessing its potential to strengthen economic resilience and broad-based development while managing any attendant risks.
Investment Policy Framework for Digital Transformation
Executive summary
Copy link to Executive summaryMobilising quality investment is key to unlocking the potential of digital transformation
Copy link to Mobilising quality investment is key to unlocking the potential of digital transformationThe rapid advancement of digital technologies is reshaping economies and societies, transforming businesses, market labour operations, delivered services, and industries evolution. Digital technologies are at the core of this transformation, driving productivity gains, fostering innovation, and creating new opportunities for economic growth. Digitalisation could also play a crucial role in addressing global challenges, from expanding access to essential services like education and healthcare to improving the reliability, durability, affordability and efficiency of energy systems. However, the transition to a digital economy is uneven. Many developing and emerging economies face structural barriers such as underdeveloped communications infrastructure, insufficient digital skills, and regulatory uncertainty that hinder digital uptake.
Attracting and mobilising quality investment is key to overcoming these challenges and unlocking the full potential of digitalisation. FDI brings not only financial capital but also technological expertise, global knowledge networks, and business practices that support the development of communications infrastructure, services, and capabilities. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) can play a central role in this process by investing in broadband networks, cloud computing, and data centres, which expand connectivity and provide the backbone for digital services. They can also contribute to digital adoption in traditional sectors, modernising industries such as manufacturing, finance, and logistics through automation, data-driven decision making, and new business models. Greenfield foreign investments in goods and services that form the backbone of digital ecosystems has seen substantial growth, rising from 15% of global greenfield investments between 2016‑2020 to 26% between 2021‑2025.
FDI can also present challenges that require careful policy responses. For example, large firms may use their market power to harm competition by reducing consumer choice, stifling innovation, and limiting opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The top 20 MNEs in ICT manufacturing, for example, accounted for 81% of total greenfield FDI in the sector between 2021 and 2025. Additionally, workers may need new skills to transition into emerging digital roles in demand by MNEs. For instance, 62% of foreign firms with changing skills needs in the OECD are looking for digital skills, compared to 55% of domestic firms.
What can governments do?
Copy link to What can governments do?This policy framework provides guidance on how governments can create an enabling environment for private investment to support the digital transformation. It identifies the key policy areas that influence digital investment decisions, including market openness, investment facilitation, competition policy, responsible business conduct, and digital skills development. By addressing market failures, regulatory misalignments, and investment barriers, the framework aims to help governments foster an investment climate that supports digital innovation, strengthens domestic capabilities, and maximises the broader economic and other benefits of digitalisation. The framework is structured around the following four building blocks, based on the FDI Qualities Policy Toolkit, and related key policy recommendations in the table below:
Governance: Effective governance of digital FDI requires clear institutional responsibilities, strong co‑ordination mechanisms, and alignment between investment and digital policies. Transparent and predictable investment policies that integrate digitalisation needs, while ensuring digital policies support investment attraction and retention, can enhance investor confidence. Given the cross-cutting nature of digital technologies, whole‑of-government co‑ordination is essential to prevent policy fragmentation and align efforts across communications infrastructure, skills development, and connectivity. Aligning investment policies with national digital strategies maximises the contribution of digital FDI to economic growth and innovation.
Domestic and international regulation: A predictable, transparent, and non-discriminatory regulatory framework is fundamental to fostering digital-intensive investment. Strong competition policies, intellectual property protection and enforcement, and facilitation of cross-border data flows reduce barriers and promote fair market conditions. Economies that maintain open, interoperable data regimes attract more investment, lower costs for domestic businesses, and foster innovation. In contrast, restrictive approaches such as forced data localisation reduce competitiveness, increase compliance costs, and slow digital growth. Regulations must remain agile to keep pace with technological advancements while mitigating risks generated by companies and activities in their supply chains. Furthermore, maintaining openness while addressing national security considerations, particularly for sensitive data and strategic technologies, is crucial for building a resilient digital investment climate. Meanwhile, international trade and investment agreements increasingly incorporate digital provisions, promoting regulatory certainty and reducing fragmentation in the global digital economy.
Technical and financial support: Encouraging investment in digital technologies, and communications infrastructure is key to fostering a competitive digital economy. Public-private partnerships, targeted incentives, and capacity-building initiatives can help overcome market failures and investment barriers such as high R&D costs, skills mismatches, and infrastructure gaps. Policies should support integration of domestic firms into global digital supply chains, enabling voluntary knowledge transfer on mutually agreed terms and local innovation. Reliable and affordable communications infrastructure, particularly in underserved regions, is a prerequisite for attracting digital-intensive investments. Bridging digital divides and promoting universal access to digital technologies while strengthening digital competences ensure that both domestic and foreign firms benefit from digital transformation.
Information and facilitation services: Investment promotion and facilitation efforts should address information asymmetries and administrative barriers that may deter digital FDI, particularly in economically lagging regions. Investment promotion agencies (IPAs) at national and subnational levels can play a key role in bridging information gaps by providing up-to-date insights on the digital ecosystem, regulatory environment, and sector-specific opportunities. Facilitating connections between foreign investors and domestic technology firms enhances innovation and voluntary knowledge transfer on mutually agreed terms, while targeted information campaigns can highlight a country’s or region’s digital strengths, such as advanced infrastructure, skilled talent and energy resources. Simplified administrative processes and enhanced transparency in investment procedures create a more attractive and efficient environment for digital investors, supporting long‑term economic growth.
Main guiding questions for policymakers
Copy link to Main guiding questions for policymakersPrinciple 1: Provide strategic direction and ensure co‑ordination and coherence on investment and digital policies.
Institutional co‑ordination on investment and digital policies: Are responsibilities for digitalisation and investment clearly defined across government institutions, and are there effective co‑ordination mechanisms to align policy objectives?
Strategic alignment and policy coherence: Are investment policy strategies and action plans aligned with key national priorities for the digital transition, including developing communication infrastructure and services, fostering digital innovation, and promoting workforce upskilling?
Principle 2: Ensure that domestic and international regulations and standards create a conducive business environment for investment in support of digital transformation.
Regulatory framework for market access: Are existing regulatory restrictions on FDI periodically reassessed against evolving public policy objectives on digital transformation and, where relevant, streamlined or removed?
Legal framework for digital technologies: Do legislative and regulatory frameworks for digital technologies (e.g. AI, blockchain, e‑commerce) provide legal certainty while remaining adaptive to technological advancements and investment needs?
Competition and intellectual property protection and enforcement policies: Does competition policy address risks such as anti-competitive behaviour, and ensure that businesses can compete on a level playing field domestically and internationally? Do intellectual property rights (IPR) protection and enforcement policies ensure a level playing field for foreign and domestic firms in the digital economy?
National security policies: If they exist, are investment screening mechanisms transparent, proportionate, and designed to address national security risks of investment in digital and emerging technology sectors without creating undue barriers to investment?
Responsible Business Conduct: Are responsible business conduct (RBC) standards integrated into investment and digital policies? To what extent do they include safeguards for cybersecurity, data protection, and trustworthy AI? Are emerging digital technologies considered and addressed within these policy frameworks?
International trade and investment agreements: Does the country promote the inclusion of provisions in international trade and investment agreements that support digital transformation, including those related to cross-border data flows, digital trade facilitation, competition, protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, and source code protection?
Principle 3: Stimulate investment and strengthen technical capabilities in digital technologies and ICT services and infrastructure.
Investment incentives: If provided, do investment incentives aim at addressing specific barriers to investment or market failures (e.g. high initial fixed costs for communication infrastructure and services development, risks in digital R&D, digital skills shortages)? Are incentives subject to regular impact assessments and evaluations?
Technical support to leverage FDI spillovers: Are capacity building programmes available to domestic firms to help them strengthen their digital capacities, voluntarily create knowledge‑sharing partnerships on mutually agreed terms with foreign investors and integrate global digital value chains?
Skills and labour market policies: Do labour market policies and workforce upskilling initiatives consider the challenges and opportunities arising from digital investment, including by anticipating and addressing digital skills shortages in FDI-intensive sectors, mitigating job displacement risks, and supporting job creation for all segments of the population?
Policies for communications infrastructure development: Has the government developed a coherent and comprehensive plan for the development of communications infrastructure and services that leverages FDI’s potential to expand connectivity while meeting electricity demand and advancing future energy efficiency and reliability?
Principle 4: Address information failures and administrative barriers to facilitate FDI in support of digital transformation.
Investment promotion and facilitation: Do investment promotion agencies (IPA) operating at national and subnational levels have a dedicated strategy to attract and facilitate digital FDI, particularly in support of economically lagging regions? Does this strategy ensure streamlined regulatory procedures, targeted investor engagement, and effective co‑ordination with industry and government stakeholders?